Subsections
We can associate a Newtonian model with purely gravitoelectric
(
). Without the gravitomagnetism, the nonlocal nature of
the Newtonian force cannot be retrieved from relativistic models. It
also excludes gravitational waves. The Newtonian model is a limited
model to show the characteristics of the gravitoelectric. We can
also consider an anti-Newtonian model; a model with purely
gravitomagnetic (
). The anti-Newtonian model obstructs
sounding solutions. In [43], it has been proven that
the anti-Newtonian model shall include either shear or vorticity.
Let us consider the Newtonian model (
) in an irrotational
static
spacetime (
) and a perfect-fluid model (
). The constraints and propagations shall be
![\begin{displaymath}\begin{array}[c]{cc} {C^{1}{}_{a}=(\mathrm{div}E)_{a}-{\texts...
...m{D}_{a} \rho=0,} & {C^{2}{}_{a}=[\sigma,E]_{a}=0,} \end{array}\end{displaymath}](img148.png) |
(65) |
![\begin{displaymath}\begin{array}[c]{c} {P^{1}{}_{ab}=-\dot{E}_{\left\langle {ab}...
...p)=0,}\\ \\ {P^{2}{}_{ab}=\mathrm{curl}(E)_{ab}=0,} \end{array}\end{displaymath}](img149.png) |
(66) |
![\begin{displaymath}\begin{array}[c]{cc} {C^{6}{}_{a}={\textstyle{\frac{2}{3}}}\m...
...0,} & {C^{7}{}_{ab}=-\mathrm{curl}(\sigma)_{ab}=0.} \end{array}\end{displaymath}](img150.png) |
(67) |
To the first order, divergence and evolution of Eq.
(66b) are
The last parameter (
)
in Eq. (68) vanishes because of irrotational condition.
Eq. (68) then conserves the constraints. Eq.
(69) must be consistent with Eqs. (65) and
(67). Thus, the last parameters in Eq. (69)
has to vanish:
 |
(70) |
It is a necessary condition for the consistent evolution of
propagation. This condition is satisfied with irrotational product
of gravitoelectric and shear, but it is a complete contrast to Eq.
(65b). Thus, the Newtonian model is generally
inconsistent with generic relativistic models. Moreover, the
temporal evolution of propagation shows no wave solutions.
The Newtonian model obstructs wave solution, due to the
instantaneous interaction. Following
[28,29,30], we consider a model
whose action propagates at infinite speed (
).
This is compatible with
, where
is an
arbitrary function of time.
We define the Newtonian potential as
 |
(71) |
On substituting into Eq. (65a), we get
 |
(72) |
In a spatial infinity, we obtain the Poisson equation of the
Newtonian
potential:
 |
(73) |
Eq. (65a) generalizes the gravitoelectric as the
Newtonian force in the gradient of the relativistic energy density.
Moreover, Eq. (66a) gives
In the Newtonian theory, we could not find the temporal evolution of
the Newtonian potential.
In an irrotational spacetime, Eq. (46) is
 |
(75) |
It introduces a scalar potential:
 |
(76) |
where
is the acceleration potential. This scalar potential
corresponds to the Newtonian potential. In the irrotational
Newtonian model, the linearized acceleration is characterized as the
acceleration potential.
Let us consider the anti-Newtonian model (
) in a shearless
static
spacetime (
) and a perfect-fluid model (
). The constraints and propagations shall be
![\begin{displaymath}\begin{array}[c]{cc} {C^{1}{}_{a}=-3\omega^{b}H_{ab}-{\textst...
...2}{}_{a}=(\mathrm{div}H)_{a}+\omega_{a}(\rho+p)=0,} \end{array}\end{displaymath}](img171.png) |
(77) |
![\begin{displaymath}\begin{array}[c]{cc} {P^{1}{}_{ab}=\mathrm{curl}(H)_{ab}=0,} ...
...b}-[\omega,H]_{\left\langle {ab}\right\rangle }=0,} \end{array}\end{displaymath}](img172.png) |
(78) |
![\begin{displaymath}\begin{array}[c]{cc} {C^{6}{}_{a}={\textstyle{\frac{2}{3}}}\m...
...ngle a\right. } \omega_{\left. b\right\rangle }=0.} \end{array}\end{displaymath}](img173.png) |
(79) |
To linearized order, divergence and evolution of Eq.
(78a) are
Eq. (80) is consistent only in the spacetime being free
from either the gravitational mass and pressure or the gradient of
expansion. According to Eqs. (77) and
(79), the last term in Eq. (81) has to
vanish:
![$\displaystyle \mathrm{curl}([\omega,H])_{\left\langle {ab}\right\rangle }=0.$](img180.png) |
(82) |
It is a necessary condition for the consistent evolution of
propagation. This condition is satisfied with irrotational vorticity
products of gravitomagnetic, but it is not consistent with Eq.
(79b):
Thus, the anti-Newtonian model is generally inconsistent with
relativistic models. Furthermore, there is not a possibility of
gravitational waves.
In an unexpansive spacetime, Eq. (79a) takes the
following form:
 |
(84) |
It defines a vorticity scalar potential
as
 |
(85) |
In the unexpansive anti-Newtonian model, the linearized vorticity is
characterized as the vorticity potential.
We may consider a gravitomagnetic model whose action propagates at
infinite speed. Let us define the anti-Newtonian potential as
 |
(86) |
We substitute Eqs. (85) and (86) into Eq.
(77b):
 |
(87) |
In a spatial infinity, we derive the Helmholtz equation:
 |
(88) |
Eq. (77b) associates the gravitomagnetic with the
angular momentum
.
Ashkbiz Danehkar
2014-04-18